AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Youtube Tomorrow Never Dies3/26/2021
In this sense, too, Seimetz, with a self-scourging artistic modesty, imagines her own work as tainted and, in imagining a better post-apocalyptic world, imagines it, too, as superseded.Close Alert Close Sign In Search Search News Books Culture Fiction Poetry Humor Cartoons Magazine Crossword Video Podcasts Archive Goings On Open Navigation Menu Menu Story Saved To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories.Photograph by Jay Keitel Facebook Twitter Email Print Save Story Save this story for later.
Youtube Tomorrow Never Dies Movie Film NoirBoth films confront grave mattersthe earlier film, a road-movie film noir, involves the coverup of a killing, and the new one is metaphysical science fiction about a strange and extreme new form of mortal contagionand both do so on the edge of practicality and exaggeration, monstrosity and triviality, reality and hallucination. Its exaggerations are wilder, its hallucinations are colder, and its physical realities and dramatic specifics are even less separable from the elements of fantasy. It is less a drama than a cry, a work that projects roiling inner furies into a controlled, symbolic form. Its an avenging vision of the political sickness that has overtaken the United States and much of the world, and of a very particular version of that sickness: when intimate relationships turn ugly. She expresses no cause, no reasonand the very idea of dying for no reason, of a personal sense of apocalypse in which emotions overwhelm reason, is the eruptive force that sets the movie in motion and gives it a hectic thrust, as others in her social ambit are quickly afflicted with the same fatal certainty. In her new, partially furnished house Amy, who lives alone, is alienated from the comforts of her solitude. She attempts to establish a tactile connection to her new property: she touches the foliage on the grounds and runs her fingers along the floorboards and the furniture. An alcoholic in recovery, she has a drink; she lights a cigarette; she lights a fire; she goes online to buy herself an urn. But the crucial connection that Amy tries to make is personal: she calls her friend Jane (Jane Adams), an artist, who, from worry about her, puts off a family obligation in order to visit her. But, after Jane heads off to the family gathering, she is gripped by the same premonition, which then gets transmitted to her brother and sister-in-law and their guests; eventually, it turns out that the infection, such as it is, has been spreading elsewhere in the neighborhoodwhether its local or more widespread is unclear, but the main dramatic link between the victims suggests that theres money involved. Yet theres an underlying emotional pathology that, in the allusive and time-fractured action, appears at the root of the catastrophean affective breakdown with comfort and luxury at the root. Amy is in a relationship with a man named Craig (Kentucker Audley, the co-star of Sun Dont Shine), who, in an early, brief, and dreamlike scene, is revealed to have a history of explosive anger. It was recently reported that Seimetz obtained a restraining order against her former partner, the filmmaker Shane Carruth, whom she alleges was abusive. In a recent interview in the L.A. ![]() In a banteringly romantic conversation with Craig, for instance, Amy reveals that she had an abortion at twenty-twoand that she doesnt regret it, since, if shed had a baby then, shed never have been able to buy the house. As for Jane, she has a troubled relationship with her brother Jason (Chris Messina) and her sister-in-law Susan (Katie Aselton), two cozy members of the suburban bourgeoisie who find her insufferably weird (as when, for instance, she cancels at the last minute when she wants to start working on her art, and then decides to drop in on them anyway, in her pajamas). The judgmental verities of their setalso reflected in a subplot of romantic crisis between their other guests, Tilly (Jennifer Kim) and Brian (Tunde Adebimpe)are portrayed as inseparable from the mortal epidemic of impending doom that sweeps through it. The disease thrusts each of its victims into a deep and abstracted inwardnessa state that is marked with flashing red and blue lights and a sepulchral sonic murk, tropes of psychological horror that are as disturbing as they are borderline absurd. The absurdity, at times, feels willfulthe world-building is slighter than the world destruction.) The malady is also signalled with quick clips of microscopic images of living liquid, from blood Jane examines and photographs. Her artwhich she makes, literally, through a microscope, and which involves specimens that she keeps in a refrigerator, in a studio that rather resembles a laboratorycomes off as the meticulously controlled premonition of an unknown taint waiting to burst forth and destroy the world of comfortable consumption that her art work decorates and that provides her very sustenance. The same goes for Seimetzs own film: its a controlled cinematic blast of principled near-nihilism in which the character of Amy herself isnt spared. Theres also a hint of a new world to come, to be built with and by the plagues survivorsor, rather, those who may well be immune to it. This is hinted at late in the film, with the appearance of a solitary, white-haired, calm-voiced hide tanner at a remote outpost. He is played by the filmmaker James Benning, whose work, unlike Seimetzs, exists largely outside the circuit of commercial distribution.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |